All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.
Maternal Risk Factors Associated with Low Birth Weight in Indonesia
Abstract
Background:
Low birth weight (LBW) is a major risk factor for death and disease in the fetus and newborn infant. However, the study about LBW and maternal risk factors involved in Indonesia is still limited.
Objective:
The present study attempted to examine the association of maternal risk factors including mother’s age, mother and husband education, mother and husband occupation and wealth, ANC visit, desired pregnancy and obstetric complication toward the occurrence of low birth weight infant across region and family wealthy.
Methods:
This study employed the data from the national survey of Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS). The latest births from married women who gave birth within 2 years (2011 and 2012) preceding the IDHS were considered as sample selection. It was approximately 15,126 respondents. The predicted risks of low birth weight were estimated using multilevel logistic analysis.
Results:
Data were collected on 15,126 pregnant women who reported 10.2% were with LBW infants. When using the multilevel logistic analysis, the factors associated with LBW were maternal delivery-baby age, mother’s education, antenatal care and pregnancy complication at significant levels of 0.01.
Conclusion:
The prevalence of preterm infants in this study was quite high. Factors affecting LBW were maternal age, maternal education, ANC visits and pregnancy complication. The ANC visit of pregnant women is a potential and feasible activity to reduce the incidence of LBW.
1. INTRODUCTION
Every mother expects that the child will be born safe and healthy. However, sometimes there are factors that affect
the growth of the fetus so that babies who are born have Low Birth Weight (LBW), premature birth, and other abnormalities or even stillbirth [1]. This LBW baby is a new born baby which has a weight less than 2,500 grams.
LBW infants can be categorized into preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and newborns with premature growth [2-4]. LBW infants are predicted to be more susceptible and more likely to die. LBW babies who can survive in general will experience health problems and cognitive impairment [5, 6]. Cases of morbidity and mortality include infectious disease, stunted in childhood period and underweight are more common in LBW babies [2, 4].
Neonatal Mortality Rate (NMR) in Indonesia is higher than the recommended level of the World Health Organization (WHO) [2]. According to Indonesian Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS) 2007, the NMR accounted for 34 per 1,000 live births in 2007, with no significant difference from 2002 [2]. The national target for the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 2015 is 23 per 1000 live births [7]. The IDHS survey also mentioned that 78.5% of neonatal deaths occur between 0 to 6 days old. It was estimated that 33,258 infants in Indonesia died due to complications of preterm delivery [8]. The variation between provinces is from the lowest in North Sumatra (7.2%) to the highest in Central Sulawesi (16.9%) [8].
The presence of LBW prevalence can illustrate poor mothers' health, malnutrition status in women, improper pregnancy care (ANC), and low socioeconomic status of mothers [2, 8]. A poor maternal reproductive health experienced, such as abortion, stillbirth, early neonatal death, pregnancy complications and large number of children, play important role in increasing the occurrence of LBW infants. Similarly, maternal behavior associated with antenatal examination, desired and undesirable pregnancy will also lead to the incidence of LBW babies [9-11].
Therefore, the underlying factors should be determined to elaborate proper strategies in reducing mother and child health problem. This study applied the data of Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDSH) to explore maternal risk factors that are attributed to the prevalence of LBW of new born baby for health planning in order to gain effective and efficient interventions.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was conducted by employing the data from important IDHSsurveys covereing national representatives of Indonesia. The IDHS collected the data on socio demographic characteristics, health status and behavior, nutrition status of mother and children, and also HIV/AIDS knowledge. The IDHS was conducted by collaboration of National Statistic Board of Indonesia, Ministry of Health, National Population and Family Planning Board, International DHS program [12, 13]. In this survey, there were three kinds of structured-questionnaire, namely house hold questionnaire, women’s questionnaire and men’s questionnaire. This paper developed and retrieved the data from the women’s questionnaire. The women’s questionnaire provided information about women and family socio demographic data, reproductive history, pregnancy experience, Antenatal Care (ANC), as well as children immunization and nutrition [12, 13].
The respondents of IDHS survey were women aged 15-49 years old selected by multistage cluster random sampling. The first stages were based on the Census Blocks (CBs), while the second stage was the household. All the IDHS methods were explained in other resources elsewhere [12]. The selected respondents who were involved in this paper were those who delivered baby within 2 years (2011 and 2012) preceding the IDHS. In addition, the missing data was excluded. Accordingly, it was approximately 15,126 respondents which were included in this study.
The ethical clearance of this study was granted by the commission on health research ethics – Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University with the certificate of approval number 016/EC/FKM/2018, dated April 4, 2018. The statistical analysis applied the frequency and percentage distribution was conducted to represent the mother’s characteristics. The calculation was performed by applying sample weight base on the IDHS 2012 [14].
The current study attempts to predict determinant on low birth weight of new born baby in Indonesia. The dependent variable was low birth weight of new born baby. The construction of this variable was based on questions in IDHS 2012. The low birth weight of new born baby was considered those who were delivered with the weight less than 2500 gram [15]. If the infant was less than 2500 gram then coded as 1 for “low birth weight” while else coded as 0.
While the independent variable was sex, mother’s age while delivery-baby, mother education attainment, working status (mother and couple), wealth, desired pregnancy, Antenatal Care (ANC) visit, complication and region. Moreover, the mother’s age at delivery comprised of less than 20 years (coded as 0), 20-34 years (coded as 1) and more than 34 (coded as 3). The education attainment was coded 0 for “no education”; 1 for “primary level”; 2 for “secondary level”; and 3 for “higher education level”. The mother’s and couple’s occupation were coded as 0 for “not work” and 1 for “working” (such as government officer, engineering/technical, administrative job, hospitality job, clerical, sales, agricultural sectors, industrial sectors, other).
The family wealth refers to household wealth index which was calculated by the possession of long-live goods in the households, such as a motorcycle or car, television and radio, refrigerator, saving and land. A principal component analysis is used to produce common factors for household, then these factors were scored. These scores were then used to classify households in welfare categories. Detailed ways of calculation can be seen in IDHS 2012 report [14]. The family wealth was five levels, namely poorest (coded as 1), poor (coded as 2), middle (coded as 3), rich (coded as 4) and richest (coded as 5) [14]. The desired pregnancy was considered as pregnancy desired at the time which coded as 1, wanted later coded as 2, or unwanted at any time as 3. The antenatal care visit referred to the number antenatal care visit during pregnancy. The women complication refers to complication during pregnancy and childbirth which referred to present or not present maternal complication either during pregnancy or at delivery. It was coded 1 for those who have experienced complication and 0 for otherwise [14]. The Indonesia was grouped into 7 regions, namely Sumatra (1), Java and Bali (2), Nusa Tenggara (3) Kalimantan (4), Sulawesi (5), Maluku (6), and Papua [17].
The multilevel logistic model was implemented to predict the probability of the occurrence of LBW by taking into account the effect of family wealth levels and the region effects. The region and family wealth level were considered as the multilevel parameterdue to different geographical regions of the Indonesia, while the family wealth level may be related to the purchasing power of mother and dietary patterns which results in pregnancy and weight of baby [15, 16]. The hypothesis was considered statistically significant if p-values were less than 0.05. The model was done by employing Stata software.
3. RESULTS
The 15,126 mothers out of 47,533 respondents were selected. In Table 1, the frequency distribution of selected variables were presented. It was found that majority of the respondents (71.0%) were aged 20-34 years and 53.5% of them had completed secondary level. The result was similar to husband education which found to be 54.7%. By mother occupation, almost 50 percent of the respondents were unemployed (45.2%) while almost all of husbands had job (98.2%). Furthermore, the economic status of mother was categorized as the poorest (28.6%). In terms of antenatal care visit, 94.5 percent of the mothers visited antenatal care. The majority (84.9%) wanted pregnancy again. Regarding the obstetric complications, it was found 12.5% had complication during pregnancy. Moreover, the respondents were primarily from Sumatra (29.3%) and Java-Bali (26.8%). Importantly, it was found that the incidence of LBW babies was 10.2 percent.
– | Birth Weight Infant | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
>=2,500g | <2,500g | Total | N | |
Mother’s age at most recent delivery | – | – | – | – |
<20 | 3.4 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 545 |
20-34 | 71.1 | 70.4 | 71.0 | 10,739 |
>=35 | 25.5 | 24.6 | 25.4 | 3,842 |
Mother education | – | – | – | – |
No education | 2.9 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 424 |
Primary | 30.1 | 36.9 | 30.7 | 4,644 |
Secondary | 53.8 | 50.4 | 53.5 | 8,092 |
Higher | 13.2 | 11.1 | 13 | 1,966 |
Husband education | – | – | – | – |
No education | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 363 |
Primary | 30.2 | 34 | 30.6 | 4,629 |
Secondary | 54.9 | 53.4 | 54.7 | 8,274 |
Higher | 12.5 | 10.5 | 12.3 | 1,860 |
Mother occupation | – | – | – | – |
Do not work | 44.9 | 47.5 | 45.2 | 6,837 |
Work | 55.1 | 52.5 | 54.8 | 8,289 |
Husband occupation | – | – | – | – |
Do not work | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 272 |
Work | 98.2 | 98.3 | 98.2 | 14,854 |
Wealthy | – | – | – | – |
Poorest | 28.21 | 32.2 | 28.6 | 4,329 |
Poorer | 20.14 | 21.4 | 20.3 | 3,066 |
Middle | 18.39 | 18.8 | 18.4 | 2,790 |
Richer | 17.57 | 15.5 | 17.5 | 2,624 |
Richest | 15.69 | 12.1 | 15.32 | 2,317 |
ANC visit | – | – | – | – |
No | 5.7 | 3.6 | 5.5 | 832 |
Yes | 94.3 | 96.4 | 94.5 | 14,294 |
Wanted pregnancy | – | – | – | – |
Then | 84.8 | 85.9 | 84.9 | 12,842 |
Later | 7.3 | 6.7 | 7.2 | 1,089 |
No more | 7.9 | 7.4 | 7.9 | 1,195 |
Obstetric complications | – | – | – | – |
No | 88.2 | 81.6 | 87.5 | 13,235 |
Yes | 11.8 | 18.4 | 12.5 | 1,891 |
Region | – | – | – | – |
Sumatra | 29.9 | 24.8 | 29.3 | 4,431 |
Java and Bali | 26.8 | 26.9 | 26.8 | 4,054 |
Nusa Tenggara | 5.7 | 8.8 | 6.0 | 908 |
Kalimantan | 10.7 | 12.8 | 10.9 | 1,649 |
Sulawesi | 16.4 | 18.9 | 16.7 | 2,526 |
Maluku | 5.7 | 3.6 | 5.5 | 832 |
Papua | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 726 |
N | 89.8 | 10.2 | 100.0 | – |
– | (13,575) | (1,563) | (15,138) | – |
3.1. Risk Factor for Low Birth Weight Infant
Table 2 shows the multilevel logistic analysis yielded that the mother’s age at delivery, mother’s education, antenatal care and pregnancy complication were significantly influence the occurrence of low birth weight at significant levels of 0.01. On the other hand, the husband education, mother occupation, husband occupation and the desired pregnancy did not affect the low birth weight at significant levels of 0.01. The multilevel logistics model was elaborated after considering the random effect of region and family wealth which has probability value of chi-square as 0.000 which is lower than significant levels of 0.01; it means that the multilevel model was significantly different to the normal logistic model. In other words, delivery-baby age, mother’s education, antenatal care and pregnancy complication significantly influence to the low birth weight across regions where the respondents live and the family wealth levels.
Characteristics | Difference between LBW and Normal | Odds Ratio | Standard Error | p>z | (95% conf. interval) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mother delivery-baby age (ref: < 20 years old) | – | – | – | – | – | |
20-34 | 0.007 | 0.723 | 0.093 | 0.009 | 0.562 | 0.929 |
>35 | – | 0.699 | 0.096 | 0.009 | 0.534 | 0.915 |
Mother education (ref. no education) | 0.001 | – | – | – | – | – |
Primary | – | 2.154 | 0.474 | 0.000 | 1.399 | 3.315 |
Secondary | – | 1.782 | 0.397 | 0.011 | 1.151 | 2.758 |
Higher | – | 1.752 | 0.423 | 0.020 | 1.091 | 2.813 |
Husband education (ref. no education) | 0.007 | – | – | – | – | – |
Primary | – | 1.053 | 0.206 | 0.794 | 0.717 | 1.546 |
Secondary | – | 1.034 | 0.205 | 0.865 | 0.702 | 1.524 |
Higher | – | 0.982 | 0.217 | 0.934 | 0.637 | 1.513 |
Mother occupation (ref. not work) | 0.056 | 0.917 | 0.051 | 0.118 | 0.823 | 1.022 |
Husband occupation (ref. not work) | 0.839 | 1.048 | 0.221 | 0.823 | 0.693 | 1.585 |
Wanted pregnancy (ref. wanted then) | 0.475 | |||||
Later | 0.879 | 0.095 | 0.234 | 0.711 | 1.087 | |
No more | 0.905 | 0.097 | 0.351 | 0.734 | 1.116 | |
ANC visit (ref. not visit) | 0.001 | 0.976 | 0.008 | 0.003 | 0.960 | 0.991 |
Complication (ref. no complication) | 0.000 | 1.731 | 0.124 | 0.000 | 1.505 | 1.992 |
Random Effect Parameter | ||||||
Region | 0.210 | 0.078 | 0.101 | 0.434 | ||
Wealth | 0.109 | 0.054 | 0.041 | 0.289 | ||
Constanta | 0.092 | 0.032 | 0.000 | 0.047 | ||
Wald chi2(df) | 100.19 | |||||
Probability > Chi2 | 0.000 | |||||
LR test vs. logistic regression: | chi2(2)=39.37 | Prob>chi2=0.000 |
Regarding to the mother’s age at delivery at Table 2, mothers who delivered their baby at the age between 20 to 34 year (adjusted odds ratio 0.723, 95% CI 0.562-0.929. p=0.009) were less likely 0.723 as compared to those who delivered at age under 20 years old (adjusted odds ratio 0.699, 95% CI 0.534-0.915. p=0.000). Furthermore, those who have primary school education were more likely 2.154 times (adjusted odds ratio 2.154, 95% CI 1.399-3.315. p=0.004) higher to have chance to give low birth weight infant, while others level of education did not have any affect toward the occurrence of low birth weight. The ANC control has significantly positive impact on the low birth weight. Those who make ANC visit less likely 0.976 to deliver a low birth weight infant as compared to those who did not make ANC visit (adjusted odds ratio 0.976, 95% CI 0.960-0.991. p=0.008). Importantly, mothers with pregnancy complication have a chance to give low birth weight infant by 1.731 then those who did not experience complication (adjusted odds ratio 1.731, 95% CI 1.473-1.948. p=0.000).
4. DISCUSSION
The rate of LBW in the present study was 10.2%, which is similar to the result in Pakistan, 10.6% [18] but different from World Health Organization (WHO) with the prevalence of LBW is 15.5% in developing countries [19, 20]. Multilevel logistic analysis showed that the mother’s age at delivery, mother’s education, lack of antenatal care and pregnancy complication were significantly associated with term low birth weight.
The finding presented mothers who delivered their baby at less than 20 years old give low birth weight infant higher than mother who delivery at age from 20 to 34 year. According to the study of Yilgwan, C (2009) the new born babies were significantly influenced by the age of mothers when they gave births. The incidence of LBW infants was high in adolescent mothers by 65.52% [21]. Moreover, Viengsaahone [22] reported that young women pregnant are found to have LBW significantly. The risk of LBW has varied according to the age of the mother. Similarly, Rizvi et al. (2007) reported the risk of LBW increases when the mother is very young [23]. Inconsistent with Mumbare et al. (2012) found no association between LBW and maternal age as significant risk factors [24].
Furthermore, the present study that found mothers with low education level or receive primary education tend to have a higher risk of LBW infants is higher than mothers with secondary education or higher. The inequalities the authors have been describing have consequences for individuals. Normally, persons ranking high in one dimension of inequality are likely to rank high in other dimensions. People tend to have similar ranks in various dimensions [8, 25]. Women with higher education may be more cautious about their weight during pregnancy as well as their baby weight. In addition, they have more access to information and are aware of the disadvantages of having a baby, such as tearing during childbirth or operative episiotomy. It has been observed that higher education can improve family socio-economic status and may have an adverse effect on delivering LBW infants. Mothers with a high level of education can make decisions about their reproductive health, including the healthcare system. These findings correspond to the results of some studies in developing countries which reported poor education related to high incidence of LBW [25, 26].
Results showed that inadequate ANC was significantly associated with LBW. Women who have had less than 4 antenatal visits are more likely to deliver LBW babies than women who have had more than four visits. Antenatal care is beneficial to the health of the pregnant woman. Good quality of prenatal care may reduce the incidence of LBW [23]. High quality ANC access should be emphasized because it is not only improves maternal health but also provides opportunities for counseling and risk assessment [21]. The result related to several researches which LBW will vary greatly depend on the ANC system and attendance levels [24, 27-29]. According to Tellapragada et al. (2016), reported mothers who did not receive any ANC or did not meet ANC visit recommendation had higher LBW infants than those who received ANC standard [26]. Similar to the study of Badshsh et al. (2008) [30] and Siugo-Abanihe and Oke (2011) [29] that the higher prevalence of LBW infants associated with the lower ANC visit.
The results showed that mothers with complications from pregnancy were more likely to give birth with LBW than those who did not have complications from pregnancy. According to many researchers found mothers with anemia have a higher incidence of LBW than mothers with anemia [20, 30, 31]. The study of Pakistan was also reported a strong relationship between maternal complications during pregnancy and infants born less than 2500 grams [32].
The policy of the Ministry of Health should focus on improving mother to complete the antenatal care recommendation so that healthcare professionals can identify risk factors or pre-complications. In addition, proper obstetric care and neonatal care are important in reducing the complications of pregnancy and improving the quality of life of the fetus.
5. LIMITATIONS
This study has some limitations on the possibility of collecting data because the new born baby weights were collected from the secondary data. The IDHS 2012 reported that 63% of deliveries were at health facility (such as hospital, health center, clinic and private doctor/ midwife). In consequence, it should be more careful to implement this study for the policy. In addition, it had a plausibility that infants did not weight and record in the public health facilities, which may result in a lower prevalence of LBW in this study.
CONCLUSION
The results of the current study provide valuable information about the major risk factors associated with LBW babies from recent national surveys in Indonesia. Mother characteristics, such as the delivery age, education attainment, non-complete ANC and complication during pregnancy, significantly affect the birth-weight of infant. Improvements in these specific risk factors might have the positive effect in reducing the incidence of LBW. Antenatal care for pregnant mothers is a necessary service to improve pregnancy outcomes. Encouraging pregnant women to receive ANC services is a potential and feasible activity in reducing the incidence of LBW. However, interventions to improve the education level of mother and girl teenager are critical for reducing the occurrence of LBW. Health education for pregnant women should be strengthened to provide health education for pregnant women seeking care and to promote the demand for skilled care at every stage of childbirth. The healthy babies have the chance to survive and become wealth in the future. Different strategies based on the context of the area should be used, with appropriate community intervention, so policy makers can design effective plans to improve the overall health of mothers and children in the selected developing countries. The findings of this study provide insights to health professionals and policymakers on strategies and interventions to reduce the prevalence of LBW in the future.
ETHICAL APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
The ethical clearance of this study was granted by the commission on health research ethics – Faculty of Public Health, Diponegoro University with the certificate of approval number 016/EC/FKM/2018, dated April 4, 2018.
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
No humans/animals were used for the studies that are bases of this research.
CONSENT FOR PUBLIATION
Not applicable.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author gives the highest gratitude to the Demographic and Health Survey Program which has granted to explore the data from Indonesia DHS 2012.