The Complications after General Anesthesia between Female and Male Genders in the First 24 Hours after Surgery

All published articles of this journal are available on ScienceDirect.

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Complications after General Anesthesia between Female and Male Genders in the First 24 Hours after Surgery

Sepideh Vahabi1 Siavash Beiranvand1 , * Open Modal Farshad Hassanzadeh Kiabi2 , * Open Modal Hamid Rastad3
Authors Info & Affiliations
The Open Public Health Journal 05 Nov 2024 RESEARCH ARTICLE DOI: 10.2174/0118749445328813241001023931

Abstract

Background

During surgery, the body responds to injury. These physiological responses lead to an imbalance in the physiologic activity of the body.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications after general anesthesia between males and females in the first 24 hours postoperatively.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study. The study population included 150 patients who were candidates for surgery in the age range of 18-55. The sampling method was simple and sequential, and the selection of samples continued to reach 75 in both male and female groups. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS v.18 software and descriptive statistics, chi-square and Repeated Measure tests. Finally, P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The incidence of some complications after general anesthesia was significantly higher in women than in men, including hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, restlessness, reduction of SaO2, hypotension, pain, vomiting, nausea, and drowsiness. Also, some complications were observed in women more than men, but they were not statistically significant, including voice violence, urinary retention, bradypnea, and shivering. Bradycardia was the only complication that was seen in men more than women but was not statistically significant. It was also observed that all complications after 24 hours significantly decreased in all patients.

Conclusion

It is suggested that in future studies, this type of study should be conducted with a larger sample size in different populations and compared with other types of anesthetics.

Keywords: Complications, General anesthesia, Sex, Surgery, Male, Female.

1. INTRODUCTION

Several factors influence the choice of anesthesia for each surgery, such as the procedure type, urgency level, and patient's condition. There is no universal anesthesia method suitable for all surgeries. Key considerations include effective pain management, monitoring physio- logical changes, individual responses to anesthetic drugs, and weighing the benefits and risks of different techniques. An anesthetist aims for a method that maxi- mizes patient safety, comfort, and surgical conditions while minimizing complications [1].

Various anesthetic procedures, like local, topical, regional, and general anesthesia, offer distinct advantages and disadvantages [2]. An anesthetist selects the appropriate type based on the patient's needs. For instance, regional anesthesia (e.g., epidural, spinal) involves injecting drugs directly into the spinal area while the patient remains awake [3]. This method minimizes the risk of complications like pulmonary aspiration, speeds up oral nutrition, and reduces recovery time [4].

General anesthesia, administered via intravenous or inhaled injection, offers rapid deployment and better cardiovascular stability and respiratory control [5]. It is often chosen when regional anesthesia isn't feasible due to factors like coagulation defects or emergencies. During surgery, the body responds to injury with hormonal changes, disrupting physiological balance [6]. General anesthesia can exacerbate this imbalance due to its delayed effects, leading to complications like blood pressure fluctuations, nausea, vomiting, and others, such as changes in heart rate, sleep disturbances, urinary retention, and skin trauma [7, 8]. Different studies have reported varying rates of complications from general anesthesia. Kluger et al. (2002) found significant physiological complications requiring long-term care in 29% of patients in a New Zealand study [9]. Another study by Babin et al. (2004) observed tachycardia in 30% of ICU patients under general anesthesia [10, 11]. Morris et al. (year) reported hypoxia in 14% of patients in their study evaluating hypoxemia post-general anesthesia [12-14]. Ajuziegu et al. (2010) noted that females experienced significantly higher rates of nausea, vomiting, headache, and back pain compared to males (P < 0.05), with women also taking longer to recover to normal health (P < 0.05) [15, 16]. In a study by Stadler et al. (2003), women experienced significantly higher rates of nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia compared to men (P < 0.05) [17]. Conversely, Canby et al. (2008) found no significant difference in complication rates between sexes [18]. Given the prevalence of general anesthesia in surgeries and potential hormonal and physiological differences between genders, this study aimed to compare complication rates within the first 24 hours post-surgery.

2. METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of surgical candidates aged between 18 and 55 years who were hospitalized in the surgical wards of Shahada Ashayer Hospital in 2017 due to conditions such as Fisher's fistula repair, hemorrhoidectomy, and hernia repair. Sampling was done easily and sequentially, continuing until the desired number of cases was reached in both male and female groups.

To determine the sample size, considering the values below and using the sample size formula, a sample size of 72 was determined in each group, which, due to potential dropout, 75 samples were selected in each group of women and men, totaling 150 samples.

2.1. Entry Criteria

Patients who were surgical candidates for Fisher's fistula repair, fistulotomy, hemorrhoidectomy, and abdominal hernia repair and had received general anesthesia and consent to participate in the study.

2.2. Exit Criteria

Lack of consent to participate in the study.

Ninety-six surgery patients were enrolled in the study. The inclusion criteria were studied, and patients were given a written informed consent form to fill out. Then, the patients were divided into two groups: male and female. Inclusion criteria for entering into the study included age 18-55, ASA CLASS I, and no systemic illness. For patients, premedication was initially administered with 1-2μg / kg fentanyl and 1-2μg/kg midazolam. Then, induction was performed with thiopental 5-6 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg atracurium, and then the intubation was performed appropriately with the coated trachea tube.

Oxygen and isoflurane (1.5%) were used, and If necessary, the muscle relaxant and narcotic were repeated. At the end of the procedure, neostigmine and atropine were used as reversal agents for muscle relaxants. If the extubation criteria were met, the extubated patient with stable vital signs was transferred to recovery. Then, necessary treatments were administered as needed. In recovery and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours post-operation, adverse effects of general anesthesia were recorded in a questionnaire administered by an unaware interviewer. After collecting and statistically analyzing the questionnaires by the project statistician, the occurrence of post-anesthesia complications between the two genders was compared.

2.3. Data Analysis

After collecting the questionnaires, a statistical analysis of the results was computed by a statistical consultant, and the complications after general anesthesia were compared between the two sexes. Data were collected and entered SPSS software v.18 software, and the ratios of central indexes and dispersion were used to analyze the data using Chi-square, Cochrane, Friedman, and Repeated Measures, and the results were reported at a significant level of 5%.

3. RESULTS

In this cross-sectional study of 150 patients, evenly split between men and women aged 18-55, there was no significant age difference between the groups (P = 0.536). Post-surgery, 56% of women and 60% of men experienced hypertension within 6 hours, declining over time. After 12 hours, stability was observed in both groups. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression indicated women had twice the likelihood of hypertension compared to men within 12 hours post-surgery (p = 0.031). Moreover, every 6 hours decreased the likelihood of hypertension by 33% (p <0.001).

In the female group, 3.58% had tachycardia upon recovery, increasing to 4.35% after 6 hours and then decreasing to 3.6% after 12 hours. For males, 80% had tachycardia at recovery, reducing to 20% after 6 hours. Stability was observed after 12 hours for females and 6 hours for males. GEE logistic regression indicated women had a 5.4 times higher chance of tachycardia than men within 12 hours post-surgery (p <0.001). Additionally, every 6 hours decreased the chance of tachycardia by 33% (p <0.001).

In the female group, 7.50% had tachypnea at recovery, decreasing to 1.45% after 6 hours and then to 2.4% after 12 hours. For males, 5.62% had tachypnea at recovery, decreasing to 5.37% after 6 hours. Stability was observed after 12 hours for females and 6 hours for males. GEE logistic regression indicated women had a 4.6 times higher risk of tachypnea than men, which was statistically significant (p <0.001). Additionally, every 6 hours decreased the chance of tachypnea by 29% (p <0.001).

In the female group, 6.63% had sound atrocities at recovery, slightly increasing to 7.22% after 6 hours and then decreasing to 6.13% after 12 hours. For males, all cases occurred at recovery. Both groups remained stable afterward. GEE logistic regression showed women had twice the likelihood of sound violence compared to men, though not significantly (P=0.11). Moreover, every 6 hours reduced the incidence of voice violence by 30%, statistically significant (p = 0.001).

In the women's group, 7.65% were restless at recovery, decreasing to 3.31% after 6 hours and 3% after 24 hours. For men, 6.78% were restless at recovery, reducing to 4.21% after 6 hours. Both groups remained stable afterward. GEE logistic regression revealed women had an 8.3 times higher likelihood of restlessness than men, statistically significant (P<0.001). The negative time coefficient suggests a reduction of 18% in restlessness every 6 hours.

Regarding urine retention, 9.76% of women had it at recovery, decreasing to 1.23% after 6 hours. For men, 5.87% had it at recovery, decreasing to 5.12% after 6 hours. After 6 hours, both groups stabilized. GEE logistic regression indicated women had an 8.1 times higher likelihood of urine retention, though not statistically significant (p <0.001). The negative time coefficient implies a chance of reduction with time (every 6 hours).

In the women's group, 6.78% had a decrease in SaO2 at recovery, decreasing to 4.21% after 6 hours. In the recovery group, all patients experienced SaO2 reduction. Both women and men remained stable after 6 and 12 hours, respectively. GEE logistic regression revealed women had 2.4 times higher chance of SaO2 reduction than men, statistically significant (p = 0.014). Additionally, every 6 hours decreased the chance of SaO2 reduction by 12%, statistically significant (p <0.001).

In the women's group, 7.6% experienced bradycardia, with no changes in the male group. There was no significant relationship between sex and bradycardia (P=0.58). Additionally, no significant sex-based difference was observed in bradypnea.

Regarding hypotension, 6.68% of women experienced it at recovery, decreasing to 3.5% after 12 hours and further reducing after 18 hours. In the recovery group, all patients had hypotension. Both women and men remained stable after 18 hours, and recovery, respectively. GEE logistic regression indicated women had a 5.3 times higher chance of hypotension than men, significant (p <0.001). Moreover, every 6 hours reduced the chance of hypotension by 19%, statistically significant (p <0.001). The results of the analysis of variance of repeated measures showed that in women, the mean score of pain severity in women and time is significantly difference (p <0.001), and in men, similarly, the mean changes, the severity of pain is also significant over time (p <0.001). It was also observed that between changes, the mean score of pain severity in both men and women over time is significant, and these changes are statistically significant between the two sexes, as these changes are significantly higher for women (Fig. 1). In the female group, 8.56% had 1 or 2 vomiting episodes at recovery, reducing to 8.37% after 6 hours and 4.5% after 12 hours. Additionally, 9.75% vomited 2 times or more at recovery, decreasing to 1.24% after 6 hours. For men, 5.62% vomited at recovery, increasing to 8.18% after 6 and 12 hours. Both groups remained stable after 12 hours with no changes. GEE regression revealed women had a significantly higher risk of vomiting than men, about 6.4 times higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, vomiting rates decreased significantly over time in both groups (p < 0.001). In the women's group, 3.54% had 1 or 2 vomiting episodes at recovery, increasing to 40% after 6 hours and 7.5% after 12 hours. Additionally, 1.73% vomited 2 times or more at recovery, rising to 9.26% after 6 hours. For men, 6.63% vomited at recovery, decreasing to 2.18% after 6 and 12 hours. Both groups remained stable after 12 hours with no changes. GEE regression revealed women had a significantly higher risk of vomiting than men, about 6.4 times higher (p < 0.001). Moreover, vomiting rates decreased significantly over time in both groups (p < 0.001). In the women's group, 3.54% experienced 1 or 2 vomiting episodes at recovery, increasing to 40% after 6 hours and 7.5% after 12 hours. Moreover, 1.73% vomited 2 times or more at recovery, rising to 9.26% after 6 hours. In contrast, in the men's group, 6.63% had vomiting at recovery, declining to 2.18% after 6 and 12 hours. Both groups remained stable after 12 hours with no changes. GEE regression indicated significantly higher nausea levels in women than men, about 6 times higher (p < 0.001). Additionally, nausea levels decreased in both groups over time.

In the women's group, 70% had mild shivering at recovery, decreasing to 30% after 6 hours, while 5.45% had moderate shivering at recovery, increasing to 30% after 6 hours. Furthermore, 80% had severe chills at recovery, decreasing to 20% after 6 hours, with all patients having severe chills after 6 hours. In the men's group, 3.77% had mild shivering at recovery, increasing to 7.22% after 6 hours. Additionally, all patients experienced moderate shivering at recovery, and 100% had very severe chills at recovery, with one patient remaining after 6 hours. GEE regression indicated a higher risk of high cholesterol levels in women compared to men within 12 hours, with the severity of nausea about 3.1 times higher in women, although not statistically significant (p = 0.50). However, both groups experienced a significant decrease in the severity of nausea over time.

Fig. (1).

Comparison of pain score between two sexes in 24 hours.

In the women's group, 4.52% experienced acoustic stimulation at recovery, increasing to 5.40% after 6 hours and decreasing to 1.7% after 12 hours. Additionally, 81% woke up with touch stimulation at recovery, decreasing to 19% after 6 hours. For men, 4.68% had acoustic stimulation at recovery, increasing to 6.31% after 6 hours, with all patients waking up with touch stimulation at recovery.

GEE regression revealed a higher risk of high sleepiness levels in women compared to men within 12 hours, approximately 3.3 times higher in women, statistically significant (p < 0.001). Both groups experienced lower levels of sleepiness over time (p < 0.001). No hyperthermia, hypothermia, myalgia, or skin trauma were observed in either group within 24 hours (Table 1).

Table 1.
The incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, voice hoarseness, restlessness, urinary retention, reduction in sao2, hypotension, vomiting severity, nausea intensity, shivering intensity and drowsiness in both sexes within 12 hours after surgery.
Hypertension
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 47 (%26.9) 55 (%31.4) 73 (%41.7) -
Yes Frequency 28 (%56) 20 (%40) 2 (%4) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 57(%29.2) 65(%33.3) 73 (%37.4) -
Yes Frequency 18(%60) 10(%33.3) 2(%6.7) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 104 (%28.1) 120 (%32.4) 146 (%39.5) -
Yes Frequency 46(%57.5) 30(%37.5) 4(%5) -
Tachycardia -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h -
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 39(%25.3) 43(%27.9) 72(%46.8) -
Yes Frequency 28(%58.3) 17(%35.4) 3(%6.3) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 67(%31.2) 73(%34) 75(%34.9) -
Yes Frequency 8(%80) 2(%20) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 114(%29.1) 131(%33.4) 147(%37.5) -
Yes Frequency 36(%62.1) 19(%32.8) 3(%5.2) -
Tachypnea -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 47(%26.6) 58(%32.8) 72(%40.7) -
Yes Frequency 36(%50.7) 32(%45.1) 3(%4.2) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency (%) 60(%29.2) 66(%32.8) 75(%37.3) -
Yes Frequency (%) 15(%62.5) 9(%37.5) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 99(%27.9) 109(%30.7) 147(%41.4) -
Yes Frequency 51(%53.7) 41(%43.2) 3(%3.2) -
Voice Hoarseness -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h -
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 61(%30) 70(%34.5) 72(%35.5) -
Yes Frequency 14(%63.6) 5(%22.7) 3(%13.6) -
Male - - - -
No Frequency 67(%30.9) 75(%34.6) 75(%34.6) -
Yes Frequency 8(%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 128(%30.5) 145(%34.5) 147 (%35) -
Yes Frequency 22(%73.3) 5(%16.7) 3(%10) -
Restlessness -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h -
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 31(%19.6) 54(%34.2) 73(%46.2) -
Yes Frequency 44(%65.7) 21(%31.3) 2(%3) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 53(%26.9) 69(%35) 75(%38.1) -
Yes Frequency 22(%78.1) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 84 (%23.7) 123 (%34.6) 148 (%41.7) -
Yes Frequency 66 (%69.5) 27(%28.4) 2(%2.1) -
Urinary Retention -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h -
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 55 (%44.4) 69 (%55.6) - -
Yes Frequency 20 (%76.9) 6(%23.1) - -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 61(%45.5) 73(%54.5) - -
Yes Frequency 14(%87.5) 2(%12.5) - -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 116 (%45) 142 (%55) - -
Yes Frequency 34(%81) 8(%19) - -
Reduction in SaO2 -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h -
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 53(%43.4) 69(%56.6) - -
Yes Frequency 22(%78.6) 6(%21.4) - -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 61(%44.9) 75 (%55.1) - -
Yes Frequency 14(%44.2) 0(%0) - -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 114 (%44.2) 144 (%55.8) - -
Yes Frequency 36(%85.7) 6(%14.3) - -
Hypotension -
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 49 (%18.7) 66 (%25.2) 73(%27.9) 74(%28.2)
Yes Frequency 26 (%68.4) 9(%23.7) 2(%5.3) 1(%2.6)
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 61 (%21.3) 75 (%26.2) 75 (%26.2) 75(%26.2)
Yes Frequency 14 (%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) 0(%0)
Total - - - -
No Frequency 110 (%20.1) 141 (%25.7) 148 (%27) 149(%27.2)
Yes Frequency 40 (%76.9) 9(%17.3) 2(%3.8) 1(%1.9)
Vomiting Severity
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 32(%20.1) 54(%34) 73(%45.9) -
1 or 2 times Frequency 21(%56.8) 14(%37.8) 2(%5.4) -
2 times< Frequency 22(%75.9) 7(%24.1) 0(%0) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 62(%30.7) 68(%33.7) 72(%35.6) -
1 or 2 times Frequency 10(%62.5) 3(%18.8) 3(%18.8) -
2 times< Frequency 3(%42.9) 4 (%57.1) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 94 (%26) 122 (%33.8) 145 (%40.2) -
1 or 2 times Frequency 31(%58.5) 17(%32.1) 5(%9.4) -
2 times< Frequency 25 (%69.4) 11 (%30.6) 0(%0) -
Nausea Intensity
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 37 (%22.6) 54 (%32.9) 73 (%44.5) -
1 or 2 times Frequency 19 (%54.3) 14 (%40) 2(%5.7) -
2 times< Frequency 19 (%73.1) 7(%26.9) 0(%0) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 66 (%31.6) 70 (%33.5) 73(%34.9) -
1 or 2 times Frequency 7(%63.6) 2(%18.2) 2(%18.2) -
2 times< Frequency 2(%18.2) 3(%60) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 103 (%27.6) 124 (%33.2) 146 (%39.1) -
1 or 2 times Frequency 26 (%56.5) 16(%34.8) 4(%8.7) -
2 times< Frequency 21 (%67.7) 10 (%32.3) 0(%0) -
Shivering Intensity
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - - - -
No Frequency 49 (%26.3) 62 (%33.3) 75 (%40.3) -
Mild Frequency 14 (%70) 6 (%30) 0(%0) -
Average Frequency 5 (%45.5) 6 (%54.5) 0(%0) -
Severe Frequency 4 (%80) 1(%20) 0(%0) -
very intense Frequency 3(%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
Gender Male - - - -
No Frequency 45 (%23.7) 70 (%36.8) 75 (%39.5) -
Mild Frequency 17 (%77.3) 5 (%22.7) 0(%0) -
Average Frequency 10 (%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
Severe Frequency 2 (%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
very intense Frequency 1 (%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
No Frequency 94 (%25) 132 (%35.1) 150 (%39.9) -
Mild Frequency 31 (%73.8) 11 (%26.2) 0(%0) -
Average Frequency 25 (%69.4) 11 (%30.6) 0(%0) -
Severe Frequency 6(%85.7) 1(%14.3) 0(%0) -
very intense Frequency 4(%100) 0 (%0) 0(%0) -
Drowsiness
Time - Recovery 6h 12h 18h
Gender Female - 54 (%33.3) - -
Awake Frequency 36 (%22.2) 54 (%33.3) 72 (%44.4) -
Sound stimulation Frequency 22 (%52.4) 17 (%40.5) 3(%7.1) -
Tactile stimulation Frequency 17 (%81) 4(%19) 0(%0) -
Gender Male - - - -
Awake Frequency 53 (%26.9) 69(%35) 75(%38.1) -
Sound stimulation Frequency 13(%68.4) 6(%31.6) 0(%0) -
Tactile stimulation Frequency 9(%100) 0(%0) 0(%0) -
Total - - - -
Awake Frequency 89 (%24.8) 123 (%34.3) 147 (%40.9) -
Sound stimulation Frequency 35(%57.4) 23(%37.7) 3(%4.9) -
Tactile stimulation Frequency 26(%86.7) 4(%13.3) 0(%0) -

4. DISCUSSION

This study aimed to compare the incidence of complications after general anesthesia between males and females within the first 24 hours post-surgery. Results indicated that women experienced significantly higher incidences of hypertension, tachycardia, tachypnea, restlessness, hypotension, pain, vomiting, nausea, and drowsiness compared to men. While some other complications were observed more frequently in women, the differences were not statistically significant. Conversely, bradycardia was slightly more common in men, albeit not statistically significant. Overall, all complications decreased significantly after 24 hours in both genders. These findings contribute to existing literature on gender differences in post-anesthesia complications, which have shown varying results across different studies.

Myles et al. found that women experienced a higher incidence of “minor” post-anesthetic side effects (nausea, vomiting, sore throat, back pain, and headache) compared to men (2000, 2003) [19].

The study aimed to compare nausea and vomiting after general anesthesia between genders, finding a higher incidence in women (P <0.05), consistent with previous research by Beattie et al. (2013) [17] and Myles et al. (2013) [20]. Respiratory complications were also more frequent in women (P <0.05), contradicting findings by Forrest et al. (2012) showing higher incidence in men [21].

The study aimed to compare cardiovascular side effects and shivering incidence after general anesthesia between males and females. Results revealed a significant increase in cardiovascular side effects in women compared to men (P < 0.05), consistent with previous findings. Conversely, the incidence of shivering was significantly higher in women than in men (P < 0.05), contrary to some previous studies, such as Hocker et al. (2010), which found no significant difference in shivering incidence between genders [22, 23].

In a study by Taenzer et al. in 2000, it was reported that the incidence of post-general anesthesia occurs more frequently in women than in men. Also, in a study by Wilson-Barnett et al. in 2012, the incidence of post-general anesthesia pain was higher in women than in men, but no significant relationship was reported [24]. Although in Puntillo et al.'s study, the incidence of post-general anesthesia in males was reported to be higher than in women [25, 26]. Similar results were observed in the study by Taenzer et al. [27].

Ajuzieogu et al. (2010) found a higher incidence of post-general anesthesia headaches in women compared to men, although the significance was not reported [15]. This aligns with previous studies examining gender differences in post-anesthesia headaches [28-31]. Conversely, Rasmussen et al. (2011) reported a significant increase in headache incidence in women compared to men after general anesthesia (P = 0.02, OR = 1.2), potentially attributed to differences in sex hormone levels [32], which is in line with McDowell et al.'s findings in 2011 [26], although significance was not reported.

Stout et al. (2007) found no gender difference in post-general anesthesia sore throat incidence [33]. Similarly, Ajuzieogu et al. (2010) observed no disparity in sore throat occurrence between males and females [12]. Myles et al. (2003) did not report a significant gender-based difference in sore throat incidence but noted respiratory issues in 21% of patients [16].

In Bagheri et al.'s 2007 study on 78 patients, the incidence of sore throat after general anesthesia was determined. Similarly, Higgins et al. (2002) reported that 45.4% of 5264 patients experienced a sore throat post-general anesthesia, with women experiencing more severe symptoms than men [33]. Conversely, Ajuzieogu et al.'s 2010 study observed a higher incidence of low back pain after general anesthesia in women compared to men [12].

In a study by Morris et al. (2004), it was found that women are more likely to experience low back pain after general anesthesia compared to men [11]. Additionally, our study aimed to compare post-general anesthesia incidence between males and females over two years. Results showed a significantly higher incidence of violence in women compared to men (P < 0.05), consistent with findings from Stout et al. (2007), where women exhibited a significantly higher post-general anesthesia incidence compared to men (37% versus 18%, P < 0.05) [33].

In a study by Cohen et al. in 2006, it was stated that there was a significant difference between female and male sexually transmitted infections due to mortality or severe complications after general anesthesia [34, 35]. These results are consistent with the results of the study by Tiret et al., 2008 [36].

In a 2013 study by Saccò et al., findings imply that alterations in the interplay between cardiovascular and pain systems due to chronic pain may lead to a higher likelihood of hypertension. The study also indicates that chronic pain intensity significantly predicts hypertension, irrespective of age, race, ethnicity, or parental hyper- tension, suggesting a potential link between chronic pain and elevated hypertension risk [37].

In a 2015 study by Young-Hyeon et al., hypertension was found to have a negative correlation with the prevalence of lower back pain (LBP) and osteoarthritis, likely due to hypertension-related pain reduction. This relationship was weakened using antihypertensive medication and longer hypertension duration [38].

A 2020 study by R Pfoh et al., reported pain was linked to higher BP during the visit and less medication adjustment by physicians, yet no increased likelihood of high BP in subsequent visits [39].

CONCLUSION

These results are consistent with findings from some studies conducted for the same purpose, while they differ from others. The inconsistencies in findings between different studies are likely attributable to various factors, including diagnostic errors, variations in sample sizes, differences in statistical power, or differing definitions of post-anesthesia complications. These limitations should be considered in interpreting the results, and further research with standardized methodologies is needed to understand these gender-related differences in post-anesthesia outcomes better.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Dr.S.V.: conceptualized and designed the study, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr.S.B. and Dr.F.H.K: designed the data collection instruments, collected data, carried out the initial analyses, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Dr.H.R: Coordinated and supervised data collection and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content;.

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

GEE = Generalized estimating equation
LBP = Lower back pain

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

After obtaining a license and code of ethics from the University's Ethics Committee, patients at the Shohada Nashir Hospital 96 surgery patients were enrolled in the study (appendicitis and abdominal hernia repair).

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and/or research committee and with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

The patients were given a written informed consent form to fill in.

STANDARDS OF REPORTING

STROBE and SAGER guidelines were followed.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data and supportive information are available within the article.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary material is available on the Publisher’s website.

REFERENCES

1
Matsuda E. Entropy monitoring in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Am J Nurs 2017; 117(3): 62.
2
Chhor V, Karachi C, Bonnet AM, Puybasset L, Lescot T. Anaesthesia and Parkinson's disease. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2011; 30(7-8): 559-68.
3
Vanegas-Arroyave N, Zaghloul KA, Hallett M, Lungu C. Leg movements during general anesthesia. Mov Disord Clin Pract (Hoboken) 2016; 3(5): 510-2.
4
Fakhr MS, Mozafari M, Rezvanfar K, et al. Investigating the risk factors for isthmocele development after cesarean delivery. AJOG Glob Rep 2023; 4(2): 100299.
5
Mesa Suárez P, Santotoribio JD, Ramos Ramos V, et al. Brain damage after general anesthesia. Med Clin (Barc) 2016; 146(9): 384-8.
6
Ellakany M. Comparative study between general and thoracic spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Egypt J Anaesth 2013; 29(4): 375-81.
7
Ozyuvaci E, Altan A, Karadeniz T, Topsakal M, Besisik A, Yucel M. General anesthesia versus epidural and general anesthesia in radical cystectomy. Urol Int 2005; 74(1): 62-7.
8
Saadat Fakhr M, Karimi F, Rezvanfar K, et al. Comparison of the effects of vitamin D and nasal calcitonin spray with nasal calcitonin spray on postoperative abdominal pain: A randomised controlled trial. Intl J Surg Open 2023; 59: 100687.
9
Devroe S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. General anesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2015; 28(3): 240-6.
10
Bayir H, Yildiz I, Sereflican M, Yoldas H, Demirhan A, Kurt A. A pediatric case of anesthesia mumps after general anesthesia. J Res Med Sci 2015; 20(11): 1123-4.
11
Zamanabadi MN, Zamanabadi TN, Alizadeh R. Measuring serum sodium levels using blood gas analyzer and auto analyzer in heart and lung disease patients: A cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 78: 103713.
12
Kluger MT, Bullock MFM. Recovery room incidents: A review of 419 reports from the anaesthetic incident monitoring study (AIMS). Anaesthesia 2002; 57(11): 1060-6.
13
Babinebell J, Keith P, Elert O. Efficacy and safety of low-dose propranolol versus diltiazem in the prophylaxis of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1996; 10(6): 412-6.
14
Morris RW, Buschman A, Warren DL, Philip JH, Raemer DB. The prevalence of hypoxemia detected by pulse oximetry during recovery from anesthesia. J Clin Monit 1988; 4(1): 16-20.
15
A VO, E HA, Chinedu N. Gender difference and quality of recovery after general anaesthesia. Internet J Anesthesiol 2010; 28: 1-4.
16
Zamanabadi MN, Alizadeh R, Gholami F, Seyed mehdi SA, Aryafar M. Effect of caffeine on postoperative bowel movement and defecation after cesarean section. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 68: 102674.
17
Stadler M, Bardiau F, Seidel L, Albert A, Boogaerts JG. Difference in risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology 2003; 98(1): 46-52.
18
Canbay O, Celebi N, Sahin A, Celiker V, Ozgen S, Aypar U. Ketamine gargle for attenuating postoperative sore throat. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100(4): 490-3.
19
Myles PS, Hunt JO, Moloney JT. Postoperative ‘minor’ complications. Anaesthesia 1997; 52(4): 300-6.
20
Myles PS, Williams DL, Hendrata M, Anderson H, Weeks AM. Patient satisfaction after anaesthesia and surgery: results of a prospective survey of 10,811 patients. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84(1): 6-10.
21
Beattie WS, Lindblad T, Buckley DN, Forrest JB. Menstruation increases the risk of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopy. A prospective randomized study. Anesthesiology 1993; 78(2): 272-6.
22
Palazzo M, Evans R. Logistic regression analysis of fixed patient factors for postoperative sickness: A model for risk assessment. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70(2): 135-40.
23
Kenny GNC. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia 1994; 49(1): 6-10.
24
Cohen MM, Duncan PG, DeBoer DP, Tweed WA. The postoperative interview: assessing risk factors for nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 1994; 78(1): 7-16.
25
Forrest JB, Rehder K, Cahalan MK, Goldsmith CH. Multicenter study of general anesthesia. III. Predictors of severe perioperative adverse outcomes. Anesthesiology 1992; 76(1): 3-15.
26
Höcker J, Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, et al. Nefopam but not physostigmine affects the thermoregulatory response in mice via α2-adrenoceptors. Neuropharmacology 2010; 58(2): 495-500.
27
Taenzer AH, Clark C, Curry CS. Gender affects report of pain and function after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Anesthesiology 2000; 93(3): 670-5.
28
Puntillo K, Weiss SJ. Pain. Nurs Res 1994; 43(1): 31-6.
29
Taenzer P, Melzack R, Jeans ME. Influence of psychological factors on postoperative pain, mood and analgesic requirements. Pain 1986; 24(3): 331-42.
30
McDowell SA, Dundee JW, Pandit SK. Para‐anaesthetic headache in female patients. Anaesthesia 1970; 25(3): 334-40.
31
Brattebø G, Wisborg T, Rodt SÅ, Bjerkan B. Intrathecal anaesthesia in patients under 45 years: Incidence of postdural puncture symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with 27G needles. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37(6): 545-8.
32
Rasmussen BK, Jensen R, Schroll M, Olesen J. Epidemiology of headache in a general population: A prevalence study. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44(11): 1147-57.
33
Stout DM, Bishop MJ, Dwerstec JF, Cullen BF. Correlation of endotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67(3): 419-21.
34
Higgins PP, Chung F, Mezei G. Postoperative sore throat after ambulatory surgery. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88(4): 582-4.
35
Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Pope WDB, Wolkenstein C. A survey of 112,000 anaesthetics at one teaching hospital (1975–83). Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 33(1): 22-31.
36
Tiret L, Hatton F, Desmonts JM, Vourc’h G. Prediction of outcome of anaesthesia in patients over 40 years: A multifactorial risk index. Stat Med 1988; 7(9): 947-54.
37
Saccò M, Meschi M, Regolisti G, et al. The relationship between blood pressure and pain. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2013; 15(8): 600-5.
38
Bae YH, Shin JS, Lee J, et al. Association between hypertension and the prevalence of low back pain and osteoarthritis in Koreans: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 2015; 10(9): e0138790.
39
Pfoh ER, Chaitoff AM, Martinez K, Keenan K, Rothberg MB. Association between pain, blood pressure, and medication intensification in primary care: An observational study. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35(12): 3549-55.