RESEARCH ARTICLE


The Effect of Varicose Veins on the Quality of Life of Adult Female Patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia



Danya Ahmed Alghamdi1, Rahaf Hasan Al-Shehri1, Mona Faisal Al-Qahtani1, *, Uzma Ali Mehmood A.1
1 Department of Public health, College of Public health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
1
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1828
Abstract HTML Views: 546
PDF Downloads: 312
ePub Downloads: 146
Total Views/Downloads: 2832
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1107
Abstract HTML Views: 314
PDF Downloads: 257
ePub Downloads: 101
Total Views/Downloads: 1779



Creative Commons License
© 2020 Alghamdi et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at Department of Public health, College of Public health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, PO Box 2435 Dammam 31441, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Tel: +966 50 498 1410; E-mail: malqahtani@iau.edu.sa


Abstract

Background:

Cases of varicose veins are increasing globally. One of the most common risk factors for developing varicose veins is the female gender. Varicose veins not only affect one’s working ability but also reduce the quality of life. There is a lack of research that focuses on the effect of varicose veins on patients’ quality of life in Saudi Arabia.

Objective:

The aim of this study was to explore the quality of life of female Saudi Arabian patients with varicose veins.

Methods:

An analytical cross-sectional research study was conducted targeting women with varicose veins in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. An online questionnaire containing two sections was distributed through social media. The first section was composed of items regarding demographic, occupational, and varicose vein-related risk factors. The second section included the items of the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ).

Results:

The study included 128 female patients aged 18 years or older, with 57 (44.5%) of them being between the ages of 45 and 54 years. Only body mass index (β = -0.304, t = -2.870, p = 0.005), frequent constipation (β = -0.258, t = -2.870, p = 0.009), and long rest periods during work (β = 0.517, t = 2.111, p = 0.037) were significant predictors of quality of life.

Conclusion:

Higher body mass index and frequent constipation were the main contributors to reduced quality of life among the participants, while a prolonged rest period during work was associated with a better quality of life.

Keywords: CIVIQ, Female, Quality of life, Varicose diseases, Risk factors, Saudi Arabia.



1. INTRODUCTION

Varicose Veins (VVs) are enlarged, tortuous veins that can affect various parts of the body, but they are primarily found in the lower extremities [1]. Cases of VVs are increasing globally [2]. The prevalence of VVs in the lower extremities ranges between 10% and 30% worldwide [3]. Based on repeated clinical examinations, the annual incidence rate of VVs is 1.4 to 2.3 per 100 person-years. The prevalence of VVs is estimated to be < 1% to 73% among women and < 2% to 56% among men [4].

Epidemiological studies have established that common risk factors for developing VVs include age, overweight and obesity [2, 5, 6], pregnancy [7, 8], contraceptive use [9], occupations that require prolonged hours of standing or walking [10-12], family history [2, 5], constipation, and smoking [2, 3, 13].

Quality of Life (QoL) has been defined as “an overall general well-being that comprises objective descriptors and subjective evaluations of physical, material, social, and emotional well-being together with the extent of personal development and purposeful activity, all weighted by a personal set of values” [14]. VVs have significant effects on patients’ QoL. In addition to being an unwanted cosmetic condition that affects the patients psychologically, VVs can cause many physical symptoms, such as skin discoloration, burning and itching sensations, and swelling of the lower extremities, which usually cause pain and discomfort [1]. Moreover, VVs may lead to serious complications associated with impaired superficial and deep venous systems [15, 16]. Therefore, developing VVs can impair a person’s functioning ability and productivity and consequently reduce their QoL [15].

The management of VVs appears to pose a significant burden on the healthcare system as it is considered one of the most common causes for appointments with primary care providers [16, 17]. The burden of the disease varies across countries [18]. The situation in Saudi Arabia is not clear regarding the prevalence of VVs, as there is a paucity of research in this area. However, one study reported the prevalence of chronic venous insufficiency in the Saudi population as 38.3%, and it was found to be higher in females (49.6%) [19].

There is a lack of research that focuses on understanding the effects of VVs on the QoL of patients in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to explore the QoL of female patients with VVs and to determine possible associations between demographic characteristics and QoL among female patients with VVs in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical approval for conducting the study was secured from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), Saudi Arabia (SA). An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia during March 2020. The population of this study was all female patients diagnosed officially by doctors as having VVs in the Eastern Province of SA. The inclusion criteria were females 18 years of age or older who had developed VVs and had been officially diagnosed with the disease. While the exclusion criteria were all male participants, females of age less than 18 years and who had not been diagnosed officially with VVs disease. All participants were kindly asked to participate voluntarily by signing an informed consent that explained the objectives of the study. The tool used to collect the data was an online questionnaire that contained two sections. The first section was composed of items regarding demographics, occupational/working status, and VV-related risk factors. The first two questions were asked to ensure that the participant met the inclusion criteria. The second section included the items of the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ).

The demographic characteristics included questions regarding age, body weight, height, nationality, marital status, educational level, monthly income, and employment status. The weight and height variables were self-reported by participants and were used to calculate the Body Mass Index (BMI) of the participants. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifications of BMI (underweight, normal, overweight, obesity class 1, obesity class 2, and obesity class 3) were used in this study [20]. However, due to the relatively small number/frequency of participants for each of the six WHO BMI levels, the BMI levels were regrouped into the following: normal (underweight + normal) if BMI was 18-24.9, overweight for BMI of 25-29.9, and obese (obesity class 1 + obesity class 2 + obesity class 3) if BMI range was 30 or above.

The VV-related risk factor questions included smoking, frequent constipation, use of contraceptives, number of children, and family history. The occupational/working conditions questions included questions regarding employment status, the nature of their profession, working years, working hours/day, standing status in the workplace, rest period/day, the period of work in a standing position, and period of work in a walking position.

The CIVIQ was developed by Launois et al. [21]. Previous studies showed that the CIVIQ questionnaire is a feasible, valid, and reliable tool for the assessment of QoL in patients with the varicose disease. It has been used frequently, and it is available in 17 languages [22]. The CIVIQ questionnaire contains 20 questions that cover four domains: ‘pain’ (four items), ‘physical’ (four items), ‘social’ (three items) and ‘psychological’ (nine items). The online questionnaire was distributed through social media (Twitter and WhatsApp) during March 2020. The participants indicated their responses based on their recall period of the previous four weeks. A five-point Likert scale response was used, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment and a lower QoL. The CIVIQ provides global index scores (GIS) by applying the following equation: (S-m)/(M-m) × 100. Where S is the sum of the scores for the patients’ answers to the 20 items; m is the minimum theoretical value if all of the answers were on the first level of the scale for all of the 20 items; and M is the maximum theoretical value if all of the items were scored at the maximum level on the scale for all 20 items.

However, to facilitate interpretation of the results, the GIS were inverted so that scores could range from 0 to 100 with higher scores corresponding to better QoL [23].

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 was used for statistical data analysis. Descriptive analysis was carried out and frequencies and summary statistics were also calculated. Independent-sample t-test and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were utilized to examine demographic differences in GIS for QoL. Regression analysis was utilized to identify the predictors of QoL. Results with a p-value < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

Table 1 summarizes the demographic characteristics and VV-related risk factors of the participants. Of the 128 female patients, 57 (44.5%) were between the ages of 45 and 54 years. Nearly one-third were between 35 and 44 years old. The majority (86%) of the participants were overweight and obese. The majority (94.5%) of the participants were Saudis. Most of the participants (85.9%) were married. More than half (56.3%) of the participants had a bachelor or postgraduate degree, while 30% had a high school education. The participants were almost equally distributed among the three categories of monthly household income. The majority (79.7%) of the participants had three or more children. The non-smokers represented the greater group, as 125 (97.7%) of the participants were non-smokers. More than half of the participants (58.6%) indicated that they frequently suffer from constipation. Of the 128 participants, 82 (64.1%) had one or more family members with VVs. More than one-third (35.9%) of the participants used contraceptives.

Table 2 reports the descriptive statistics for the occupational/working conditions of the participants. Seventy-six (59.4%) of the participants were unemployed/household, while 52 (40.6%) of them were employed. Educational professions were the most common among the employed participants, as 28 (21.9%) of them worked in an educational field. Nearly two-third (62%) of the employed participants had been working in their current occupation for more than 10 years. The majority (36 of 52) of the employed participants worked for 8 hours per day. Forty-two percent (22 of 52) of the employed participants had approximately 30 1-hour breaks. Almost all (50 of 52) the employed participants (96%) worked in a profession that required them to stand. However, 30 of 52 (58%) of the workers were working in a standing position for 2-4 hours per day. On the other hand, the majority (30 of 52, 58%) of the participants worked in a walking position for less than two hours per day, while only 10 of 52 (19%) worked in a walking position for more than 4 hours.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the demographic characteristics and varicose vein-related risk factors of the participants (n = 128).
Variable Categories Frequency Percentage
Age < 35 years
35–44 years
45–54 years
> 55 years
16
41
57
14
12.5%
32.1%
44.5%
10.9%
BMI (kg/m2) Normal
Overweight
Obese
18
56
54
14.1%
43.7%
42.2%
Nationality Saudi
Non-Saudi
121
7
94.5%
5.5%
Marital status Married
Unmarried
110
18
85.9%
14.1%
Education Less than high school
High school
Bachelor/postgraduate
18
38
72
14.1%
29.7%
56.2%
Monthly household income > 10,000 Saudi Riyal (SR)
10,000–15,000 SR
< 10,000 SR
44
40
44
34.3%
31.3%
34.4%
Number of children None
One child
Two Children
Three or more
11
5
10
102
8.6%
3.9%
7.8%
79.7%
Smoking status Smoker
Non-smoker
3
125
2.3%
97.7%
Frequent constipation Yes
No
75
53
58.6%
41.4%
Family member(s) with VVs Yes
No
82
46
64.1%
35.9%
Contraceptive use Yes
No
46
82
35.9%
64.1%
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for the occupational/working conditions of the participants (n = 128).
Variable Categories Frequency Percentage
Employment status Unemployed
Employed
76
52
59.4%
40.6%
Nature of work/profession Educational profession
Administrative work
Healthcare profession
Hairdresser
Household
28
13
9
2
76
21.9%
10.1%
7.0%
1.6%
59.4%
Working Years < 5 years
5–10 years
> 10 years
Not applicable
5
15
32
76
3.9%
11.7%
25.0%
59.4%
Working hours/day 4 hours
6 hours
8 hours
> 8 hours
Not applicable
2
8
36
6
76
1.6%
6.2%
28.1%
4.7%
59.4%
Do you stand at work? Yes
No
Not applicable
50
2
76
39.0%
1.6%
59.4%
Rest period/day < 20 min
20–30 min
30 min-1 hour
> 1 hour
Not applicable
4
20
22
6
76
3.1%
15.6%
17.2%
4.7%
59.4%
Period of work in a standing position < 2 hours/day
2-4 hours/day
> 4 hours/day
Not applicable
3
30
19
76
2.3%
23.4%
14.8%
59.4%
Period of work in walking position < 2 hours/day
2-4 hours/day
> 4 hours/day
Not applicable
30
12
10
76
23.4%
9.4%
7.8%
59.4%

3.1. QoL and Demographic Characteristics

Table 3 summarizes the mean scores ± standard deviation for GIS by demographics, VV-related risk factors, and working condition factors for participants. For the demographics and VV-related risk factors, the highest overall GIS were found for the age group < 35 years, followed by those in the age group 35–44 years (64.2 and 56.7, respectively). GIS for participants with normal weight were greater than those participants who were overweight or obese (64.5, 56.4, and 53.6, respectively), indicating that obese and overweight patients tended to report worse QoL. Saudi participants had worse GIS (56.0) than non-Saudis (62.1). Married women had lower scores (55.8) than those of unmarried women (59.8). The GIS seemed to increase with the level of education. Women who had less than a high school education exhibited the lowest mean scores (49.5), followed by those with a high school education (55.3) and those with bachelor or postgraduate education (58.6). Regarding family size, the highest GIS were found among women who had one child (61.5), followed by those for women who had no children (58.7). There was a significant difference (p = 0.001) between those who suffered from frequent constipation and those who did not (51.8 and 62.7, respectively), indicating a better QoL of those who did not suffer from frequent constipation. Patients who had family members with VVs tended to have lower GIS than those who did not have a family history of VVs (54.6 and 59.4, respectively). There was little difference in GIS between those who used contraceptives and those who did not.

3.2. QoL and Working Conditions

The GIS indicated a better QoL among employed participants than that of unemployed participants (57.7 and 55.4, respectively). According to the types of profession, the lowest GIS were among hairdressers (53.1), and the highest were among education professionals (60.8). Participants who had been in their jobs for less than five years had higher GIS than those who had been at their jobs longer. Participants who worked for four hours per day had higher GIS than the other employed participants. The GIS of those whose work required them to stand were lower than those participants who were not required to stand at work (57.7 and 56.2, respectively). Additionally, those who had less than a 20-minute break during their work had the lowest GIS, while those who had more than a one-hour break had the highest GIS (50.9 and 74.3, respectively).

The GIS for those who worked in a standing position for less than two hours per day were the highest, while those working for more than four hours had the lowest (68.6 vs. 54.8, respectively). The GIS scores for those walking at work for about two to four hours per day were the greatest, while for those walking at work for more than four hours were the lowest (62.2 and 48.2, respectively). However, no statistically significant difference was found for the GIS among the studied groups based on working condition variables.

3.3. Regression analysis: Global Index Score

Linear regression was performed to examine whether age, BMI, marital status, education level, monthly salary, employment status, profession, years of working, working hours, standing during work, rest periods at work, amount of time in a standing position at work, amount of time walking at work, number of children, family member(s) with VVs, or frequent constipation predict GIS of QoL (Table 4). The results showed that only BMI (β = -0.304, t = -2.870, p = 0.005), frequent constipation (β = -0.258, t = -2.870, p = 0.009), and having a rest period during work (β = 0.517, t = 2.111, p = 0.037) were significant predictors of QoL. A significant regression equation emerged (F = 2.280, p < 0.05), and the corresponding R2 value was 0.247. This indicated that only 24.7% of the variance in GIS of QoL was explained by BMI, frequent constipation, and having a rest period; conversely, 75% of the variance might be attributed to other factors.

Table 3. The mean ± standard deviation Global Index Scores (GIS) for each studied group.
Variables Categories mean GIS ± standard deviation p-value
Age (years) < 35
35–44
45–54
55 or greater
64.2 ± 23.1
56.7 ± 14.3
54.4 ± 18.9
54.4 ± 16.0
0.267
BMI Normal
Overweight
Obese
64.5 ±19.3
56.4 ± 16.3
53.6 ± 18.5
0.080
Nationality Saudi
Non-Saudi
56.0 ±17.8
62.1 ± 20.3
0.387
Marital status Unmarried
Married
59.8 ± 21.1
55.8 ± 17.4
0.380
Education < High school
High school
Bachelor or higher
49.5 ± 22.7
55.3 ±17.6
58.6 ± 16.5
0.147
Monthly income < 10,000 SR
10,000–15,000 SR
> 15,000 SR
54.7 ± 22.0
56.2 ± 14.4
58.1 ± 16.5
0.680
Employment Unemployed
Employed
55.4 ± 20.1
57.7 ± 14.2
0.494
Type of profession Educational profession
Administrative work
Healthcare profession
Hairdresser
Household
60.8 ± 15.2
54.0 ± 13.6
54.3 ± 9.2
53.1 ± 23.8
55.4 ± 20.1
0.683
Working years < 5 years
5–10 years
> 10 years
N/A
60.2 ± 19.7
54.0 ± 12.2
59.0 ± 14.3
55.4 ± 20.1
0.721
Working hours per day 4 hours
6 hours
8 hours
> 8 hours
N/A
80.6 ± 4.41
55.3 ± 13.1
57.0 ± 14.2
57.5 ± 13.0
55.4 ± 20.1
0.422
Do you stand at work? Yes
No
N/A
57.7 ± 14.4
56.2 ± 8.83
55.4 ± 20.1
0.787
Rest period < 20 min
20–30 min
1 hour
> 1 hour
N/A
50.9 ± 19.7
54.2 ± 12.9
57.5 ± 13.0
74.3 ± 7.77
55.4 ± 20.1
0.138
Period of work in a standing position < 2 hours
2–4 hours
> 4 hours
N/A
68.7 ± 20.8
58.4 ± 13.9
54.8 ± 13.5
55.4 ± 20.1
0.546
Period of work in a walking position < 2 hours
2–4 hours
> 4 hours
N/A
59.0 ± 15.2
62.2 ± 13.0
48.2 ± 7.31
55.4 ± 20.1
0.244
Number of children None
One child
Two children
Three or more children
58.7 ± 20.9
61.5 ± 15.9
55.5 ± 17.8
55.9 ± 17.9
0.883
Smoking status Smoker
Non-smoker
57.5 ± 28.2
56.3 ± 17.8
0.915
Frequent constipation Yes
No
51.8 ± 12.4
62.7 ± 22.2
0.001*
Family member(s) with VVs Yes
No
54.6 ± 15.9
59.4 ± 21.0
0.146
Contraceptive use Yes
No
56.9 ± 16.9
56.0 ± 18.6
0.803
Table 4. Regression analysis of global index scores.
- Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients t p-value
- B Standard Error β
(Constant) 9.696 78.261 0.124 0.902
Constipation -9.371 3.511 -0.258 -2.669 0.009*
Age -0.255 2.350 -0.012 -0.108 0.914
BMI -7.837 2.731 -0.304 -2.870 0.005*
Marital status -8.355 5.578 -0.162 -1.498 0.137
Education 4.648 2.679 0.188 1.735 0.086
Income 1.857 2.148 0.086 0.865 0.389
Employment status 56.188 70.919 1.541 0.792 0.430
Profession -2.572 2.873 -0.183 -0.895 0.373
Working years 1.556 4.539 0.112 0.343 0.732
Working hours/day 0.458 4.737 0.029 0.097 0.923
Standing status 12.251 13.308 1.669 0.921 0.359
Rest period at work 7.156 3.389 0.517 2.111 0.037*
Work in standing position -3.623 5.727 -0.278 -0.633 0.528
Work while walking -1.886 2.925 -0.183 -0.645 0.520
Number of children 1.468 2.404 0.075 0.611 0.543
Family member(s) with VVs 2.812 3.510 0.075 0.801 0.425

4. DISCUSSION

The aim of this study was to explore the QoL of female patients in eastern Saudi Arabia who have VVs and to determine potential associations between demographic characteristics of these patients and their QoL. Limited epidemiological studies have been conducted to evaluate VVs, especially in the Middle Eastern region. This may be due to the low mortality involved with VVs, although the morbidity and disability involved are substantial. This study is one of the few studies that considered assessing the associations between the global QoL value and the demographic characteristics of the patients. Thus, the results of the present study will provide the groundwork for future studies and the upgrading of patients’ individual health.

This study was conducted among 128 females who were diagnosed clinically with VVs. Older participants (ages 45 and older) had worse QoL based on mean GIS compared to that of younger participants. Female patients with VVs may suffer from reduced QoL as they grow older in part due to limitations in their physical abilities and social impairment. Our results are consistent with the findings of Clark et al. [24], Ortega-Santana et al. [25], Soydan et al. [26] that showed that QoL decreased as age increased.

Previous studies have conveyed that obesity is a risk factor for developing VVs [2, 5, 6]. In our study, a higher BMI of participants was associated with a reduction in overall QoL. This was an important finding, as it shows that overweight and obese patients with VVs may suffer from worse QoL compared to patients with normal BMI. The findings of this study confirm the need for weight reduction interventions to improve the QoL of VV patients. Moreover, Branisteanu et al. [27] reported that BMI was associated with the severity of chronic venous disease for the female group in their study. This finding was consistent with the possible explanation of the poor QoL among obese participants, as they may suffer from a more severe form of the disease [24, 28, 29].

It was observed in this study that the participants who had less than a high school degree suffered from worse QoL according to their GIS. This finding is consistent with a study done by Soydan et al. [26] in 2017, where 58.3% of the participants had an educational level of high school or below. These results could be explained by how health and health care-seeking behaviors are influenced by educational level, making individuals with higher education more inclined to adopt a healthier lifestyle and have better access to healthcare. Our study was in line with that of Kahn et al. [28], who found that education level was associated with QoL scores.

As more than half (58.6%) of the patients suffered from frequent constipation, this supports the findings in other studies that constipation has an influence on the development of VVs [2, 3, 13]. However, no previous study considered the effect of frequent constipation on the QoL of VV patients. Our study demonstrated that constipation had a significant negative effect on the QoL of patients with VVs. Overall, the findings revealed that increased BMI and frequent constipation were associated with worse QoL. However, an increased rest period during the workday was associated with better QoL.

In the present study, the GSI were low in participants who worked in standing position for long hours in a day and had a poorer QoL than that of their counterparts. In previous studies, standing for a long-term was believed to be a secondary risk factor for VVs [30, 31], stressing that the standing position increases problems related to VVs and recommending leg elevation to decrease the potential development of VVs.

This study has some limitations. First, since this study was restricted to female patients with VVs, the results should be generalized with caution. Future studies should involve male patients to more broadly compare the QoL of patients with VVs. Second, the present study was conducted during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic, which made the distribution and collection of data through social media safer for both patients and researchers. However, using social media as a means to reach the patients may have affected the number of respondents. Other methods of collecting data in future studies are recommended. Third, although several associations were identified in this study, cause-effect relationships were not identified; therefore, causality cannot be assumed.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study demonstrate that female VV patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia have a low QoL. Increased BMI and frequent constipation in the VV patients had significant negative effects on QoL, while prolonged rest periods during the workday positively impacted QoL.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Ethical approval of the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) (UGS-2020-03- 006) of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU), in Saudi Arabia.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

No animals were used in this research. All human research procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the committee responsible for human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

All patients participated on a voluntary basis and gave their informed consent.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The data that supports the findings of this article is available from the corresponding author [M.F.Q], upon reasonable request.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank all patients participating in this study.

REFERENCES

[1] Wang M, Sharma AK. Varicose veins. J Radiol Nurs 2019; 38(3): 150-4.
[2] Ebrahimi H, Amanpour F, Bolbol Haghighi N. Prevalence and risk factors of varicose veins among female hairdressers: A cross sectional study in north-east of Iran. J Res Health Sci 2015; 15(2): 119-23.
[3] Yun M-J, Kim Y-K, Kang D-M, et al. A study on prevalence and risk factors for varicose veins in nurses at a university hospital. Saf Health Work 2018; 9(1): 79-83.
[4] Tabatabaeifar S, Frost P, Andersen JH, Jensen LD, Thomsen JF, Svendsen SW. Varicose veins in the lower extremities in relation to occupational mechanical exposures: A longitudinal study. Occup Environ Med 2015; 72(5): 330-7.
[5] Lee AJ, Robertson LA, Boghossian SM, et al. Progression of varicose veins and chronic venous insufficiency in the general population in the edinburgh vein study. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2015; 3(1): 18-26.
[6] Zolotukhin IA, Seliverstov EI, Shevtsov YN, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic venous disease in the general Russian population. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2017; 54(6): 752-8.
[7] Hall H, Lauche R, Adams J, Steel A, Broom A, Sibbritt D. Healthcare utilisation of pregnant women who experience sciatica, leg cramps and/or varicose veins: A cross-sectional survey of 1835 pregnant women. Women Birth 2016; 29(1): 35-40.
[8] Tahmasbi SF. Discomforts in pregnancy: Varicose veins. Int J Childbirth Educ 2017; 32(1): 30-1.
[9] Tepper NK, Marchbanks PA, Curtis KM. Superficial venous disease and combined hormonal contraceptives: A systematic review. Contraception 2016; 94(3): 275-9.
[10] Joseph N, B A, Faizan Thouseef M, Devi M U, Abna A, Juneja I. A multicenter review of epidemiology and management of varicose veins for national guidance. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2016; 8: 21-7.
[11] Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME, Castro-Sánchez AM, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, de Dios Luna J, Moreno-Lorenzo C, Del Pozo E. Evaluation of pain associated with chronic venous insufficiency in Spanish postmenopausal women. Menopause 2015; 22(1): 88-95.
[12] Karmacharya RM, Prajapati L, Rai S. Risk assessment of varicose veins among the traffic police of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal. Indian J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2019; 6: 107-9.
[13] Neethu MJ, Khatua S, Bhunia M, et al. Assess the clinical morbidities of varicose veins and its risk factors among construction workers in Bhubaneswar. I-Manager’s J Nurs-Nagercoil 2019; 9(1): 20-5.http://dx.doi.org.library.iau.edu.sa/10.26634/jnur.9.1.16101
[14] Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference? Pharmacoeconomics 2016; 34(7): 645-9.
[15] Mallick R, Lal BK, Daugherty C. Relationship between patient-reported symptoms, limitations in daily activities, and psychological impact in varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; 5(2): 224-37.
[16] Onida S, Lane TRA, Bootun R, Davies AH. Varicose veins and their management. Vasc Surg 2019; 37(2): 73-80.
[17] Jacobs BN, Andraska EA, Obi AT, Wakefield TW. Pathophysiology of varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017; 5(3): 460-7.
[18] Shakya R, Karmacharya RM, Shrestha R, Shrestha A. Varicose veins and its risk factors among nurses at Dhulikhel hospital: A cross sectional study. BMC Nurs 2020; 19: 8.
[19] Bawakid KO, Al-Raddadi RM, Sabban SS, Alturky KA, Mohamed MS. Prevalence of chronic venous insufficiency in the Saudi adult population. Saudi Med J 2005; 26(2): 225-9.https://europepmc.org/article/med/15770295
[20] World Health Organization. 2018.Obesity and overweight https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
[21] Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B. Construction and validation of a quality of life questionnaire in chronic lower limb venous insufficiency (CIVIQ). Qual Life Res 1996; 5(6): 539-54.
[22] Launois R, Mansilha A, Lozano F. Linguistic validation of the 20 item-chronic venous disease quality-of-life questionnaire (CIVIQ-20). Phlebology 2014; 29(7): 484-7.
[23] Scoring and missing data https://www.civiq-20.com/scoring-missing-data/ n.d.
[24] Clark A, Harvey I, Fowkes FGR. Epidemiology and risk factors for varicose veins among older people: Cross-sectional population study in the UK. Phlebology 2010; 25(5): 236-40.
[25] Ortega-Santana F, Limiñana JM, Ruano F, Ortega-Centol A, Palomino-Martín A, Jiménez F. The influence of the CIVIQ dimensions on quality of life of patients with primary superficial venous incompetence 2014.https://www-sciencedirect-com.library.iau.edu.sa/science/article/pii/S1078588414004055?via%3Dihub
[26] Soydan E, Yılmaz E, Baydur H. Effect of socio-demographic characteristics and clinical findings on the quality of life of patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Vascular 2017; 25(4): 382-9.
[27] Branisteanu DE, Feodor T, Baila S, Mitea IA, Vittos O. Impact of chronic venous disease on quality of life: Results of vein alarm study. Exp Ther Med 2019; 17(2): 1091-6.
[28] Kahn SR, M’lan CE, Lamping DL, Kurz X, Bérard A, Abenhaim LA. Relationship between clinical classification of chronic venous disease and patient-reported quality of life: Results from an international cohort study. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39(4): 823-8.
[29] Kutlu AK, Cecen D, Kutlu ST. Determination of disability and quality of life according to clinical classification of patients with chronic venous insufficiency. Turk J Vasc Surg 2010; 19: 29-37.
[30] Kurz X, Lamping DL, Kahn SR, et al. Do varicose veins affect quality of life? Results of an international population-based study. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34(4): 641-8.
[31] Campbell WB, Decaluwe H, Boecxstaens V, et al. The symptoms of varicose veins: difficult to determine and difficult to study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34(6): 741-4.