RESEARCH ARTICLE


Impact of Socioeconomic Disparities, General Health, Reproductive, and Exercise Status in Indian Women with Lumbopelvic Pain



Priyanka Sushil1, Jasmine K. Chawla1, *, Raju K. Parasher2
1 Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201303, India
2 Amar Jyoti Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Delhi, Delhi 110092, India


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 399
Abstract HTML Views: 186
PDF Downloads: 145
ePub Downloads: 120
Total Views/Downloads: 850
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 285
Abstract HTML Views: 110
PDF Downloads: 105
ePub Downloads: 81
Total Views/Downloads: 581



Creative Commons License
© 2023 Sushil et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India; Tel: 9888263685; E-mail: jkchawla@amity.edu


Abstract

Background:

Evidence suggests links between several health conditions and lumbopelvic pain (LPP) in women beyond the commonly associated musculoskeletal origins of LPP.

Objective:

This study explored the association of LPP with general health conditions, stress, exercise, and socioeconomic status in Indian women.

Methods:

In a cross-sectional study, 500 urban women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds were asked to fill out a self-report questionnaire that sampled their health and reproductive status.

Results:

Women sampled were in the age range of 18-62 years. Overall, the prevalence of LPP was found to be 76.8% and was predominantly observed in women from the lower socioeconomic strata (70.5%), compared to women from the higher strata (29.4%). Multivariate logistic regression identified gynecological issues, such as menstrual problems (O.R.= 472.86, p<0.0001); polycystic ovarian syndrome (O.R.= 125.04, p=0.010); and health issues, such as urinary incontinence (O.R.=3078.24, p=0.001); chronic cough (O.R.= 84.97, p<0.0001); stress (O.R.= 474.27, p<0.0001) as being significantly related to LPP. Additionally, ‘no exercise’ (O.R.= 360.15, p <0.0001) was also strongly associated with LPP.

Conclusion:

Our data suggest that LPP is a significant problem in Indian women, with a greater prevalence in women from the lower strata of society. Importantly, given that several general, gynecological health issues, psychological stress, and a lack of exercise are associated with it, there is a need for LPP sensitization at a community and public health level. Regarding its prevention and long-term management, it is important to rule out and consider the impact of these factors on LPP, beyond its musculoskeletal origins.

Keywords: Lumbopelvic pain, General health, Gynecological health, Stress, Exercise, Indian women.